In short
Patch testing applies a substance to skin under controlled conditions to look for reactions. A clinical patch test diagnoses an existing allergy, and an HRIPT is a formal study run by a specialist organization. A home "try a little on your arm" test is neither, and it cannot establish safety, because sensitization can develop later and other people differ. Read the guide, then apply it to the claims you see every day.
What you will learn
- Say what different skin tests can and cannot show
- Critique a claim based on testing
Before this lesson: Phototoxicity: Study Guide
What to look for as you read
- The difference between diagnosing an allergy and studying a product.
- Why a single negative result does not generalize.
- Why you must not run skin tests on your own study compositions.
Practical exercise: Critique three testing claims
This is a desk exercise and involves no skin testing.
- Collect three real claims: for example "dermatologically tested", "hypoallergenic" or "clinically tested on 50 people".
- For each, write what test might lie behind it, and what information is missing.
- Write what you could reasonably conclude, and what you could not.
- Write the question you would put to the brand, and to a safety assessor.
You have done this well if no claim is accepted or rejected without a reason, and you can explain to someone why a home skin test cannot establish safety.
Knowledge check
Written and reviewed by the RUŌOD Lab team. This is general education, not legal, regulatory, medical or safety advice. Example dilutions and exercises are for learning, are not validated products, and have not been safety-assessed. Completing a lesson confers no qualification. How we check these lessons.